In a bold corporate statement, Danish construction giant Tscherning has returned its entire Tesla fleet—not for performance reasons, but due to Elon Musk’s growing alignment with far-right political views. The company emphasized that its values were no longer aligned with Tesla’s CEO. This comes amid a wider backlash across Europe: France: Tesla sales dropped 67% in May 2025 Sweden: Down 54% EU overall: A 40% decline in Tesla sales (Jan–Apr) despite rising EV demand Tscherning declared: “It’s not about the car, it’s about who we choose to drive with.” Meanwhile, Tesla faces mounting pressure from: European automakers pushing affordable EVs Chinese brands rapidly expanding across Europe Criticism over its limited model lineup and public perception of Musk’s rhetoric This move underscores how executive behavior and brand identity are increasingly influencing corporate buying decisions in the sustainability era. #Tesla #ElonMusk #BrandEthics #EVNews #CorporateResponsibility

A photo I found from pre-school photo day. I'm on the right and my mum posted it on Facebook without realising what I was doing.

London-based Builder.ai, once valued at $1.5 billion and backed by Microsoft, has shockingly filed for bankruptcy after revelations showed its “AI-driven” software development was actually being performed by 700 human engineers in India. Builder.ai's supposed AI assistant “Natasha” was marketed as a revolutionary tool that could automatically create apps. But internal documents and whistleblower reports revealed Natasha was little more than a scripted chatbot interface—while real humans did the heavy lifting. To make matters worse, Builder.ai allegedly inflated revenues through a shell partnership with VerSe Innovation, falsely claiming $220 million in 2024 sales, when in reality the figure was closer to $50 million, according to auditors. The scandal has sparked broader concern about how startups are overhyping AI capabilities to attract funding and valuation—without delivering actual automation. This collapse serves as a wake-up call for investors and regulators to demand more transparency in the AI space and verify whether “artificial intelligence” claims are genuinely backed by technology—or just a human-powered illusion. #AIHype #BuilderAI #StartupScandal #TechFraud #AIvsHumans #NatashaScam #TransparencyInTech #Microsoft #FakeAI

Found this on Facebook

Neuroscientists and futurists alike are increasingly entertaining the idea that one day we may upload our minds—memories, thoughts, and personalities—into machines. The concept, known as mind uploading, involves digitally mapping the human brain at the synaptic level and recreating it in a computer simulation, enabling a person to potentially live on beyond their biological form. The challenge? The human brain has approximately 86 billion neurons and trillions of synaptic connections. To accurately replicate consciousness, we’d need to scan, map, and model every signal pathway with extreme precision—something current technology cannot yet do. Still, progress in neural interfaces, brain-computer mapping, and AI is fueling optimism. While some optimists predict breakthroughs by 2045, most experts believe full mind uploading may take over a century to achieve—if ever. But the implications are staggering: immortality, digital consciousness, and even interstellar travel through information rather than biology. For now, it remains a captivating pursuit at the intersection of neuroscience, ethics, and computing. #MindUploading #DigitalImmortality #Neuroscience #FutureOfConsciousness #BrainSimulation