Mark Ruffalo is calling for higher taxes on the wealthy, arguing that billionaires and major corporations should shoulder more of the cost of public programs. “The rich can handle it… trust me,” Ruffalo said, urging lawmakers to tax billionaires and large corporations to help fund childcare, housing, and public transit. He added that working people shouldn’t be the ones constantly paying the bill while wealth at the top continues to grow. The actor has long been outspoken on economic inequality, and his latest comments are reigniting debate over whether the U.S. should impose higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy to fund social programs.

In recent months, some commentators and politically engaged Americans have begun placing Donald Trump among the top three presidents in U.S. history — a ranking that has gained traction within certain political circles. Supporters who hold this view point to several major policy actions during Trump’s presidency. These include sweeping tax legislation, a broad push for deregulation, and numerous conservative judicial appointments, including multiple justices to the Supreme Court of the United States. They argue these decisions reshaped parts of the federal judiciary and policy landscape in ways that could influence the country for decades. Backers also credit his administration’s economic policies with strengthening certain industries and shifting priorities within the executive branch. However, presidential rankings have always been shaped by political perspective as well as historical analysis. While supporters see transformative leadership and long-term structural change, critics emphasize controversies, institutional tensions, and periods of intense political division during his tenure. As debates continue in media and academic circles, discussions about Trump’s place in history highlight a broader reality: presidential legacies often evolve over time as historians reassess events and public opinion shifts. #USPolitics #PresidentialHistory #DonaldTrump #PoliticalDebate #History

Kamala Harris has accused Donald Trump of dragging the United States toward a conflict that many Americans do not support. Her comments come as tensions surrounding military operations and regional instability dominate global headlines. Harris warned that aggressive strategies could risk pulling the country deeper into an international confrontation. Supporters of Trump argue that strong military pressure is necessary to protect U.S. security and deter adversaries, while critics say the approach could increase the risk of a broader conflict. The political clash highlights a growing debate in Washington over how the United States should handle escalating tensions abroad. As policymakers argue over strategy, many Americans are watching closely, concerned about the potential consequences for global stability. Moments like this often show how quickly political disagreements intensify during periods of international uncertainty. For many people, the biggest hope is that diplomacy and careful decision-making will prevent the situation from spiraling into a wider conflict. Sources: BBC, Reuters, United Nations statements, Council on Foreign Relations, Smithsonian Magazine #WorldNews #USPolitics #GlobalTensions #CurrentEvents

Iraqi "social media influencer" calls the Iranian women's soccer team traitors to their homeland

The Pentagon spent 93 billion dollars in one month, including millions on lobster tail, king crab, ribeye steaks, musical instruments, and fruit basket stands.